You don’t need a new camera

Alexander J.E. Bradley

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

The Namib – Namibia
Photography: Alexander J.E. Bradley • Nikon D200 • Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 35-70mm ƒ/2.8d @ 35mm • ƒ/7.1 • 1/180 • ISO 100

Recently I worked on an image of the sand dunes of the Namib. I had woke whilst it was still dark and made my way to the desert, each foot sinking into the sand as I battled the dunes. Morning had just broken by the time I got my camera out and the sun was so low that it really gave body and form to the landscape. There was a pink on the horizon that bled into a baby blue sky and made the scene ethereal.

Not more than ten minutes after I took this photo the sun would already be so high in the sky that it would blanket everything with harsh light rendering the landscape monotone and dull. It was a peaceful, serene moment, and I remember it like yesterday. It was not yesterday though; it was almost a decade ago. So I could not help but contain a laugh when someone commented that the dynamic range and colours were superb and a testament to the quality of my new camera. It was, however, shot on a 10MP camera I bought back in 2005.

On holiday with my dad – Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Photography: Alexander J.E. Bradley • Minolta SRT 101 • Minolta Mc Rokkor -Pf 55mm f/1.7 • Kodak film

This might sound a bit condescending coming from someone who just upgraded their camera this year, but I held onto my previous one for a very long time. Over seven years of daily professional use in fact and even now it has not been relegated to the dust shelf but continues to see the light of day as a second body and backup camera. There is a time that comes where upgrades are necessary. For me, that was a shutter count nearing the end of its lifespan, and as a professional, I could not afford to be in the middle of a job when it went bust.

Coincidently that was something that just happened to a colleague of mine who had the same camera from about the same age… and it went in the middle of a job. For you, the reason to upgrade could be that you shoot low light portraits and you have reached the point where you need the better ISO capabilities to satisfy your clients. More often than not though I see people upgrade well before they have reached the limitations of their current cameras.

The Eiffel Tower – Paris, France
Photography: Alexander J.E. Bradley • Nikon D200 • Nikon FNikkor 24mm f/2.8 D @ f/8 • 1/250 • ISO 100

To be honest, asking a photographer which camera they shot an image with is about as offensive as asking an author which pencil they wrote with. I went shooting with my 20-year-old film camera the other day and brought home some fantastic images that hold up to the most modern digital cameras of today. Whilst there are some technological advancements that make newer bodies easier to use, frame rate, ISO performance, dynamic range, stabilisation, megapixels, flip screen, wifi with a 100 focal points: the question is still, do you need it?

Having a fast frame rate is great if you are a pro sports photographer, but if you are not, it does not do much. How often do you find yourself in legitimate need of shooting at ISO 128,000? Could you not find a tripod or light? Does a flip screen make you a better photographer? Yes, shooting silent can be advantageous in some situations, but unless you are shooting stills on a film set, do you absolutely need it? Most cameras today are the same as they were a decade ago, but with more bells and whistles.

Cristo Redentor – Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
Photography: Alexander J.E. Bradley • Nikon D200 • Nikon AF-Nikkor 24mm f/2.8 D @ f/7.1 • 1/200 • ISO 100

I will admit shiny things are nice to have… but there are other ways to take better photos than getting a new body. Is there an improvement in your lens selection you should look at? How about an extra hard drive to backup your existing photos? Will a sturdy tripod widen your shooting possibilities? Or, better still, why not take a photography tour with Aperture Tours. At a fraction of the cost of a new body, we can teach you how to get the best out of your existing camera and open up the possibilities of further technical and creative opportunities.

I am always happy when I help people shoot scenes, and they stare with amazement at the back of their screen, commenting “That is MY camera that just shot that”. All of the images in this blog were taken with my camera that I bought back in 2005, and it was not necessarily the best camera back then either. You would have to pixel push quite a bit to tell me why the quality is anything less than my images of today.

Sakura Blossom – Tokyo, Japan
Photography: Alexander J.E. Bradley • Minolta SRT 101 • Kodak film

If you are an avid reader of photography blogs, you will be bombarded with articles about the latest cameras and the newest lens. Rumour websites run rife with speculation about what two dots over the eye piece could mean and scour the net for leaked images. While these sites may be technically independent, the camera companies still lend them bodies to showcase free of charge. It is in their interest to make a hype around their new products, and in the bloggers, interest to get as much traffic to their site as possible. But if you just buy a new camera each time it comes out, you are not a photographer; you are a camera collector.

Victoria Falls – Zimbabwe
Photography: Alexander J.E. Bradley • Nikon D200 • Nikon AF-Nikkor 24mm f/2.8 D @ f/16 • ½ Second • ISO 100

Your camera can do a lot more than you may realise, you just need to harness its power. Read your manual, take a class, study photographers you admire and look at their work critically. But most of all, get out there and shoot, shoot and shoot some more. Practice is your best tool to better photography. You do not need a new camera; you need to get over the idea that a new camera will make your photography better, and instead concentrate on advancing your photography skills. You do not need a new camera; get over the idea that it will improve your photography, instead concentrate on improving your photography skills.

Dhow Sunrise – Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
Photography: Alexander J.E. Bradley • Nikon D200 • Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 35-70mm f/2.8d @ 70mm • Ƒ/11 • 1/500 • ISO 100

About the Author

Alexander J.E. Bradley is the founder of Aperture Tours: professional photography guided tours, designed to help you get the best out of your camera whilst exploring wonderful cities with a local. A professional photographer for over a decade Alexander enjoys shooting the surreal by mixing dreamlike qualities into his conceptual images.

You can check out more of Alexander’s work on his website, Facebook page, YouTube channel, 500px, and Flickr. Also, make sure to follow him on Instagram and Twitter. This article was also published here and shared with permission.

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

DIPY Icon

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 responses to “You don’t need a new camera”

  1. Madara Avatar

    You don’t know me! ;-)

    1. Madara Avatar

      My name is James, and I’ve got a gear problem.

  2. david carnes Avatar
    david carnes

    I have never understood why anyone would take offense at being asked what camera they have. It is the non photographer’s attempt at paying you a compliment. They are complimenting you on the level they understand. They might even be searching for some common ground with you. Get over it already.

  3. Chris Hutcheson Avatar

    I’m with you on holding on to gear. I have a Nikon D4 here that has served me well for almost 6 years, and it’s been exactly what I needed for what I shoot (theatrical, low light, and some sports). It’s now at about 384,000 exposures, and I’ll happily replace the shutter mechanism soon. My backup camera? A D300.

  4. veryferry Avatar
    veryferry

    “Says the one with top of the range gear”

  5. Aankhen Avatar
    Aankhen

    So I could not help but contain a laugh when someone commented that the
    dynamic range and colours were superb and a testament to the quality of
    my new camera.

    Did this really happen? What a silly comment.

    How often do you find yourself in legitimate need of shooting at ISO 128,000? Could you not find a tripod or light?

    Is it so hard to imagine subjects and conditions different from the ones you’re used to?

    But if you just buy a new camera each time it comes out, you are not a photographer; you are a camera collector.

    Are there really people who do this? Is this really a problem? Enough to warrant an entire article about it?

    Or, better still, why not take a photography tour with Aperture Tours.

    Oh, I see.

    You would have to pixel push quite a bit to tell me why the quality is anything less than my images of today.

    Not really. The limitations are self-evident even in these small, Web-friendly JPEGs, and they have no bearing on your (impressive, I must say) skills and great subjects.